Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-19 House Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-19 House Journal Page 1330 HB 212 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 212 "An Act relating to a factor in aggravation of the presumptive term of a criminal sentence, and prohibiting the referral of a sentence based on application of that factor to a three-judge sentencing panel as an extraordinary circumstance." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) 5DP 1NR 975 -5 ZERO FNS (ADM,ADM,CORR,LAW,COURT) 4/5/93 976 FIN RPT CS(JUD) 7DP 1173 -5 PREV ZERO FNS (ADM,ADM,CORR,LAW,CT)4/5 1174 Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 212(JUD) (same title) There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative MacLean placed a call of the House and lifted the call. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Davies: Page 4, line 23: Delete "18(D)" Representative Davies moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative MacLean objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-19 House Journal Page 1331 HB 212 CSHB 212(JUD) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Brice, Brown, Carney, Davidson, Davies, Finkelstein, Grussendorf, Navarre, Nordlund, Sitton Nays: Barnes, Bunde, B.Davis, G.Davis, Foster, Green, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Nicholia, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Willis Absent: Menard, Williams And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Representative Phillips moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 212(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 212(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 212(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 212(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 38 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Barnes, Brice, Brown, Bunde, Carney, Davidson, B.Davis, G.Davis, Finkelstein, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Hanley, Hoffman, Hudson, James, Kott, Larson, Mackie, MacLean, Martin, Moses, Mulder, Navarre, Nicholia, Nordlund, Olberg, Parnell, Phillips, Porter, Sanders, Sitton, Therriault, Toohey, Ulmer, Vezey, Williams, Willis Nays: Davies 1993-04-19 House Journal Page 1332 HB 212 Absent: Menard And so, CSHB 212(JUD) passed the House and was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.